A great connection … even if it is fantasy – or is it!
My website contains further resources that may be of interest …
There are three stages in the hero’s journey, the preparation, the journey and the return. You can relate these three stages to past, current and future ‘journeys’ of your own. I’ve found that reflecting within this framework can bring interesting results. I’ve used it a fair bit with teams as a creative exercise.
|Preparation: Archetypes of the Family
The archetypes of preparation can be seen as connecting with the inner child (Innocent and Orphan) and the inner parent (Caregiver as nurturing parent; Warrior as protecting parent). These four archetypes tend to be active in young people and/or organizations that are new or that employ or serve people who are at the preparation level of development. Together, these archetypes provide an inner “family” that makes the individual less dependent upon the health of the family of origin. When all four are awakened in an individual or organization, he/she/it generally is able to move on to The Journey.
|THE INNOCENT Every era has myths of a golden age or of a promised land where life has been or will be perfect. The promise of the Innocent is that life need not be hard. Within each of us, the Innocent is the spontaneous, trusting child that, while a bit dependent, has the optimism to take the journey.|
|THE ORPHAN The Orphan understands that everyone matters, just as they are. Down-to-earth and unpretentious, it reveals a deep structure influenced by the wounded or orphaned child that expects very little from life, but that teaches us with empathy, realism, and street wisdom.|
|THE WARRIOR When everything seems lost, the Warrior rides over the hill and saves the day. Tough and courageous, this archetype helps us set and achieve goals, overcome obstacles, and persist in difficult times, although it also tends to see others as enemies and to think in either/or terms.|
|THE CAREGIVER The Caregiver is an altruist, moved by compassion, generosity, and selflessness to help others. Although prone to martyrdom and enabling behaviors, the inner Caregiver helps us raise our children, aid those in need, and build structures to sustain life and health.|
|The Journey: Archetypes of Transformation and Change
These archetypes of metamorphosis personify the process of seeking out new options; tearing down what no longer serves; committing to people, values, and activities; and creating new forms. They are expressed most often in individuals (adolescence, midlife, retirement, etc.) and organizations in times of transition, and all of them want to maximize personal freedom and fulfilment. When all four are awakened within individuals or organizations, they become ready for The Return.
|THE EXPLORER The Explorer leaves the known to discover and explore the unknown. This inner rugged individual braves loneliness and isolation to seek out new paths. Often oppositional, this iconoclastic archetype helps us discover our uniqueness, our perspectives, and our callings.|
|THE DESTROYER The Outlaw/Destroyer embodies repressed anger about structures that no longer serve life even when these structures still are supported by society or by our conscious choices. Although this archetype can be ruthless, it weeds the garden in ways that allow for new growth.|
|THE LOVER The Lover archetype governs all kinds of love—from parental love, to friendship, to spiritual love—but we know it best in romance. Although it can bring all sorts of heartache and drama, it helps us experience pleasure, achieve intimacy, make commitments, and follow our dreams.|
|THE CREATOR The Creator archetype fosters all imaginative endeavours, from the highest art to the smallest innovation in lifestyle or work. Adverse to stasis, it can cause us to overload our lives with constant new projects; yet, properly channeled, it helps us express ourselves in beautiful ways.|
|The Return: Archetypes of the Royal Court
When the archetypes of the return are activated, people and organizations know who they are at a deeper level than they once did. Now they are motivated to seek out ways to use their gifts and perspectives to make a difference in the world. They no longer yearn to be taken care of, and they do not blame others or find excuses. Rather, they live and work in ways that express their values, commitments, and talents in a socially responsible manner. These archetypes generally are awakened and in balance within psychologically mature individuals and organizations able not only to benefit from the rights of living in a free society, but also to undertake the responsibilities of active, engaged citizenship.
|THE RULER The Ruler archetype inspires us to take responsibility for our own lives, in our fields of endeavour, and in the society at large. If he/she overcomes the temptation to dominate others, the developed Ruler creates environments that invite in the gifts and perspectives of all concerned.|
|THE MAGICIAN The Magician archetype searches out the fundamental laws of science and/or metaphysics to understand how to transform situations, influence people, and make visions into realities. If the Magician can overcome the temptation to use power manipulatively, it galvanizes energies for good.|
|THE SAGE The Sage archetype seeks the truths that will set us free. Especially if the Sage overcomes the temptation of dogma, it can help us become wise, to see the world and ourselves objectively, and to correct/fine-tune our course based on objective analyses of the results of our actions and choices.|
|THE JESTER The Jester archetype urges us to enjoy the process of our lives. Although the Jester can be prone to laziness and dissipation, the positive Jester invites us all out to play–showing us how to turn our work, our interactions with others, and even the most mundane tasks into FUN.|
Stories about heroes are deeply embedded in our culture and literary heritage. Joseph Campbell, in ‘The Hero with a Thousand Faces’, identified both the archetype of the Hero and the quest that the hero follows, in many of the folk tales and myths of the world. This archetype and its journey was surprisingly invariant through many of the tales. Carol Pearson, in ‘Awakening the Heroes Within’ expands the idea of the Hero into twelve distinct archetypes, each of which can follow the Hero Quest. Throughout our lives we may engage in many heroic journeys, such as growing up, working through our careers, becoming parents, and meeting the myriad of challenges we encounter during our four score years and ten. Each journey we undertake has the potential to take us to ever deeper levels of awareness and competence – and capacity developed from the challenges of one area of our lives has the potential to be applied to future challenges in other areas.
Returning to the twelve archetypes, Carol Pearson describes them in terms of the following criteria:
- Quest: The path which the archetype has set out on. The hero may not realise s/he is on such a path until it is too late to retreat.
- Fear: This is the fear which is usually the motivating factor for undergoing the Quest.
- Obstacles: In most Quests the hero soon meets the major problems or obstacles which need to be overcome in order for the Quest to be successful.
- Task: This is the task that the hero must accomplish in order to succeed at the Quest. Succeeding at the task requires that the Obstacles are fully overcome. However failure to overcome the Obstacles can lead to the expression of the shadow self (as ‘described’ under the Quest’s associated Obstacles).
- Reward: Succeeding at the Quest earns the hero the rewards of self development, fulfilment (temporarily at least!) and an increased ability to engage in new Quests.
The heroic archetypes and their associated criteria are as follows:
Quest: To remain safe.
Fear: Being abandoned.
Obstacles: Denial, repression, irrational optimism, inappropriate risk taking.
Task: Experience disillusionment and disappointment but retain optimism to deal with adversity.
Reward: Trust and optimism.
Quest: To regain safety.
Fear: Being exploited.
Obstacles: Cynicism, callousness, using the victim role to manipulate the environment.
Task: Acknowledge the truth of one’s plight and feel pain/abandonment, replace dependence with interdependence and resilience.
Reward: Interdependence, realism and resilience.
Quest: To win.
Fear: Being weak.
Obstacles: Ruthlessness, unprincipled need to win, viewing ‘difference’ as a threat.
Task: To fight only for what really matters with fairness and integrity, seeking win/win outcomes.
Reward: Courage and discipline.
Quest: To help others.
Fear: Being selfish.
Obstacles: Suffering martyr, aiding and abetting other people’s irresponsibility or narcissism.
Task: To give without harming self or others, empowering – not ‘doing’ – for others.
Virtue: Compassion and generosity.
Quest: To search for a better life.
Fear: Being a conformist.
Obstacles: Excessive ambition, perfectionism, addictiveness in general.
Task: Exploring, experimenting, ambition, becoming the best you can.
Virtue: Autonomy and ambition.
Quest: To gain happiness and harmony.
Fear: Being unloved.
Obstacles: Jealousy, envy, obsessive fixations including sex and conversely puritanism.
Task: To follow what you love, making commitments, connecting self with the collective.
Virtue: Passion and commitment.
Quest: To metamorphosis.
Fear: Being annihilated.
Obstacles: Self-destructiveness (incl. drug and alcohol abuse) and/or destruction of others.
Task: Grappling with loss and/or death, letting go of dysfunctional beliefs/behaviours.
Quest: To gain identity.
Fear: Being inauthentic, of no ‘substance’.
Obstacles: Creation of negative circumstances, limited opportunities, workaholism.
Task: Opening self to inspiration and creating what you imagine or envisage.
Virtue: Individuality and vocation.
Quest: To create order.
Fear: Being in a state of chaos.
Obstacles: Controlling, rigid, tyrannical, manipulative behaviours.
Task: Take responsibility for self and own development, working towards a better world.
Virtue: Responsibility and control.
Quest: To transform.
Fear: Being unaligned, unconnected.
Obstacles: Turning what is positive into negative.
Task: Consciously using the knowledge that everything is connected to everything else.
Virtue: Personal power.
Quest: To find truth.
Fear: Being deceived, unable to find the ‘truth’.
Obstacles: Unfeeling, being ‘cut-off’, critical, judging, pompous behaviours and attitudes.
Task: To attain enlightenment, acceptance of subjectivity as part of the human condition.
Virtue: Wisdom and non-attachment.
Quest: To enjoy life for its own sake.
Fear: Of being bored, not ‘alive’.
Obstacles: Self-indulgence, sloth, irresponsibility.
Task: To trust in the process of experiencing life ‘in the moment’, one day at a time.
Virtue: Joy and freedom.
Your Journey …. ?
My website contains further resources that may be of interest …
Thinking about ‘impact’ and the significance of a good mission statement
Measuring impact is the only way an organization can know whether its efforts and use of resources (often other people’s money) is doing any good. Logically, organizations that measure impact perform better and evolve faster. Furthermore, explorations around the theme of measuring impact invariably lead to continuous improvement in effectiveness and efficiency within organizations that engage in such explorations.
At the highest level of description, ‘impact’ can be defined as an improvement brought about by an intervention.
Here are five steps aimed at determining the impact and calculating the return on investment of an organization’s operations:
1. Establish, unambiguously, what you’re trying to accomplish, i.e. your real mission.
You can’t think about impact until you know what you’re setting out accomplish, and most mission statements offer little value in this regard. To counteract this, re-formulate (or formulate!) your mission in a phrase of 8 words or less that includes:
(1) a target population,
(2) a verb, and
(3) an ultimate outcome that identifies something to measure.
Here are some examples:
- Providing households with best-value internet access
- Improving the life-chances of young people
- Expanding older people’s quality-of-life choices
- Providing people in [location] with quality affordable homes
- Generating for shareholders best-in-class sustainable returns
- Facilitating public sector employees in accessing leadership development
If you can’t establish this kind of concise statement, there’s little point in going any further, either because you don’t really know what you’re trying to do or because you simply wouldn’t know if you were doing it!
2. Pick the right indicator(s)
Work out the single best indicator that would demonstrate mission accomplished. Here’s some examples relating to the missions shown above:
- Increased number of households accessing the internet
- Increased numbers of young people achieving a sustainable start in their working lives
- Greater variety of retirement solutions being accessed
- Growing base of stable tenancies
- Top quartile returns on invested capital
- Greater take-up of leadership development activities
Sometimes it is possible to realise a single best indicator – and this is ideal. Other times you might need to capture the outcome through a carefully chosen, and minimal, combination of indicators. The clear aim here is to be able to answer, at appropriate review points, the critical question “Are we fulfilling our mission?”
3. Get real numbers
The aim of this step is to evidence a change that has arisen from you operations. This means being able to show a change from an established baseline, having made the appropriate measurements in the appropriate way. Essentially, measuring the right thing and measuring it well.
4. Make the case for attribution
If you have real numbers that show impact, you need to make the case that it was your efforts that caused the change. This is the hardest part of measuring impact, because it asks you to be able to say what would have happened without you. When real numbers show there has been a change, a useful thing to ask is “what else could possibly explain the impact we observed?”
There are three levels – in ascending order of cost and complexity – of demonstrating attribution:
- Narrative attribution: You’ve got before-and-after data showing a change and a credible story that shows that it is very unlikely that the change was from something else. This approach is vastly overused, but it can be valid when the change is big, tightly coupled with the intervention, involves few variables (factors that might have influenced the change), and you’ve got a deep knowledge of the setting.
- Matched controls: At the outset of your work, you identified settings or populations similar enough to ones you work with to serve as valid comparisons. This works when there aren’t too many other variables, you can find good matches, and you can watch the process closely enough to know that significant unforeseen factors didn’t arise during the intervention period. This is rarely perfect; it’s often good enough.
- Randomized controlled trials: RCT’s are the gold standard in most cases and are needed when the stakes are high and there are too many variables to be able to confidently say that your comparison groups are similar enough to show attribution.
5. Calculate return on investment
Once you’ve established your operations are having a real and measurable impact, you need to know what it cost. You can always generate impact by spending very large sums of money, but this is unlikely to be sustainable, scaleable or ‘fair’ on investors/funders.
The easiest and arguably most valid way to calculate return on investment is to divide the total money spent by the total impact. In organizations that do more than one kind of project, it is often possible to split out what they spent for their various impacts. Remember that start-ups are expensive so bear this in mind in the early stages of an operation, but do see if their projections for steady-state operations make sense and assume (as experience will tell) that such projections are usually at the optimistic end of the scale!
In the end, though, the key to evaluating real impact is an honest, curious, and constructive skepticism. A healthy dose of scepticism (not cynicism) is essential.
My website contains further resources that may be of interest …
My website contains further resources that may be of interest …
Benchmarking is a valuable way of improving understanding of your business performance and potential by making comparisons with other businesses. It is usually helpful to compare yourself against businesses in the same sector.
1. Process efficiency. Look at the mechanics of your business such as the production techniques, quality controls, stock management and so on. How effective are they? How well are you using your technology? Are other businesses benefiting from new ways of doing things?
2. Allocation of resources. Are you putting resources into the same areas as competitors? Do they have more employees, or fewer? In which parts of the business? Have they invested more in IT and other equipment? Are they spending more on marketing?
3. Weigh your costs against industry norms. These might include utility bills, wages or research and development costs. If you can highlight areas where your costs are higher than the average, you may be able to make savings.
1. Calculate sales per employee. This will provide a straightforward measure of productivity and efficiency. If your sales are comparatively low, investigate the reasons; you might find the problem is not with your sales staff but your product, or that you are pitching to the wrong market.
2. Look at the output of your employees. Are you drawing effectively on their strengths and aptitudes? Think about ways to refresh motivation and renew productivity. Recent research indicates that people are hungry for training. By aligning their training wants with your business needs you gain their loyalty for any future upturn.
My website contains further resources that may be of interest …
My website contains further resources that may be of interest …
The Leadership Pipeline: Are the right leaders in the right jobs?
Commentators on business and organization development are repeatedly saying we are facing a serious lack of effective leadership in organizations today. Often repeated themes include:
- Most leaders are retiring without leaving effective successors.
- Most organizations are recruiting from outside for replacement leaders because they haven’t developed future leadership capability from within their organizations.
- Even organizations that are investing in well-funded leadership programs aren’t getting the results they need. Often they are adopting programmes which last only as long as the current leader stays. Thereafter, the new leader brings a new approach, so leadership programmes tend to be gimmick driven.
- There is little take-up with regard to national standards for leadership. Most programmes and approaches are made up in response to problems rather than driven by principles.
In The Leadership Pipeline: How to Build the Leadership-Powered Company, (Charan, Drotter and Noel, 2001, Jossey-Bass), the authors set out a new foundation for leadership development that aims to bring clear value to organization life and performance. Their model helps us to understand and measure leadership performance and acknowledges that the results required of leaders change as they move through an organization’s hierarchy. Such change is related to skills, time application and work values (see Table 1).
Charan, et al’s operating definition of leadership is to make performance happen. Moreover, management and leadership ‘potential’ comes a distant second to making performance happen. This being the case, organizations need to move away from the many programmes in which potential is the focus. Leadership is not about new programmes, it’s about establishing an enduring and flexible architecture that makes performance happen, gets the work done, and achieves results. The goal of effective HR management is to get full performers in every job, now and in the future, no matter how much the work changes, and to retain only those jobs that are absolutely necessary. Having high performance people in unnecessary jobs is a waste for the organization as well as for those that occupy such positions. And it creates energy around things that aren’t important. The place from which to start is the work itself and then work out the jobs/positions that need to be established.
Knowing when and how to select leaders is critical. Most organizations wait too long to choose the new person, and often give the position to someone from outside the company. In more successful organizations, however, good leaders are grown not imported and the selection is not based on personality or an arbitrary set of standards. Promoting top business school graduates with MBAs and intellect is of limited value unless they are both willing and able to get things done.
Drotter proposes that 75% of the causes for work not being done can be attributed to the leader because:
- Jobs and goals aren’t clearly defined;
- The leader is inaccessible because s/he’s too busy – often doing work that the subordinate could do:
- The leader recruited the wrong person (this isn’t the recruited person’s fault!).
If we accept this view, it becomes critical to test future leaders before promoting them. The key question to ask yourself is, “Can they handle additional challenges while keeping up with present responsibilities?” If they can sustain current performance while successfully leading others, they may have what it takes. But how can you tell?
|Moving through the pipeline – required changes in time application, skills and values.|
|Change in time application||Change of skills||Change of work values|
|From managing self to managing others||First-line managers must learn to allocate time so that not only is their own assigned work completed, but also they help others perform effectively (not the same as ‘doing the work for them!).||Shifting from doing work to getting work done through others.||From valuing their individual work to valuing managerial work.|
|From managing others to managing managers||In this phase managers should only manage. They need to divest themselves of individual tasks.||Selecting people to turn passage one, assigning managerial and leadership work to them, measuring their progress as managers and coaching them.||Learning to hold first line managers accountable for managerial work rather than technical work.|
|From managing managers to functional manager||Here the focus becomes one of participating in business team meetings and working with other functional managers. The task is to create a functional strategy that enables staff to do something better than the competition and develop a sustainable competitive advantage within their function.||Developing new communication skills and being able to manage some areas that are unfamiliar. Learning to consider other functional needs and concerns. Team working with other functional managers and competing for resources based on overall business needs.||Adopting a broad, long-term perspective.|
|From functional manager to business manager||Allocating time to think is a major requirement at this level. Business managers need to stop doing something every minute of the day and reserve time to reflect and analyse.||Business managers are responsible for the bottom line. Rather than consider the feasibility of an activity, the business manager must examine it from short and long term profit perspectives.||Valuing the success of their own business.|
|From business manager to group manager||Here the transition for the manager is from running their own business to succeeding indirectly by managing and developing several businesses and business managers.||The skill set is associated with being able to evaluate strategy in order to allocate and deploy capital, develop business managers, develop and implement a portfolio strategy, and assess whether businesses have the right core capabilities to win.||Deriving satisfaction from the success of other people’s businesses. Appreciating the management of a portfolio of businesses.|
|From group manager to enterprise manager (CE)||This top level position involves the setting of direction and development of operating mechanisms to know and drive quarter-by-quarter performance that is in tune with the longer term strategy. A subtle shift takes place from strategic to visionary thinking and from an operating to a global perspective. The task is to let go of the pieces and focus on the whole. It’s about assembling a team of high-achieving, ambitious direct reports, knowing some of them will want the position you occupy!||The ability to manage a long list of external stakeholders proactively is essential for success at this level.||Learning to value trade-offs. Appreciating managing one holistic entity with a deep appreciation of systemic influences and effects.|
Drotter has developed the idea of ‘performance portraits’ to provide an initial indication of where a team member is positioned within their job – and goes on to describe the leadership task associated with each portrait. Below are some generic portraits you might recognise from your own experiences of leading teams. Everything within the circle is the responsibility of the individual who holds the job. Everything outside the circle is the responsibility of someone else. The lines stand for achievement against seven basic performance standards, i.e. operating results, customer results, leadership results, management results, relationships, social responsibility, and individual technical competence. You might wish to allocate different attributes to the seven lines. A full line indicates that the performance standard is being achieved. An incomplete line indicates that it is not.
The work of the leader who accepts that performance and succession management is a key part of their role is to help people move through these steps. In addition, building transition coaching into an organization’s repertoire will undoubtedly add value to the whole process.
Returning to an earlier point, all levels have to deliver, but each has to deliver something different. Included in Charan, et al’s pipeline model are six transitions or passage points. At each of them, a promoted leader has to shift to a new layer of responsibility and performance. Showing up at work and doing what s/he did before won’t be enough. A successful succession plan understands that current and future leadership performance differs by layer, and each layer must work at the right level if dysfunction is to be avoided. A question to ask is, ‘What difference in results are you seeing because of the people in management jobs?’ If the differences are not evident, you’re overpaying! What do you get for increased salaries that couldn’t be got by individual contributors at a lower cost?
The Six Transitions of the Leadership Pipeline
Next we will look at the six transitions or passage points proposed by Charan et al.
Beginning of career/appointment – Self Management
In the first six months on the job, values are established that stay forever. The management task is to help good individual contributors move from being managed, i.e. doing only what they are told to do, to self-management, i.e. to engaging their initiative and managing themselves. Self management may be exactly where some contributors are best suited. It is important that you are not seduced into promoting good individual contributors to management positions unless there is clear evidence of management capabilities and interest. You are looking for leaders who instinctively lead every time they can – just as avid golfers golf every time they can. It is worthy of note that the best technical people are often least likely to become effective managers. In fact, given a promotion to which they are not suited, and which overly challenges their skills and preferred behaviours, individual contributors may begin to cause significant team problems. Ideally, there should be a technical career path to allow good individual contributors to grow their earnings and assume greater technical responsibility.
Passage One – Managing Others
Although this may seem like an easy and natural leadership passage, it requires a new value
system in which managing assumes a higher value than doing self-managed work. People often trip up here. The biggest problem is that individual contributors who are promoted often keep doing what they were doing before but at a more frantic level. This causes the people who report to them and who are looking for leadership from their managers to become disillusioned with management. A leader’s job is to help others do their work well. Good managers of others don’t solve their people’s problems – they support their people to solve their own problems. Their job is one of planning and assigning work, filling jobs, coaching and measuring the work of others. They shift from doing work to making sure that others are doing the work. Because the pressure to spend more time on managing will increase with each passage, managers of others must begin making the change at this level to avoid becoming liabilities and clogging the pipeline as they move up. The most difficult transition for managers to make at this passage is to learn to value managerial work rather than just tolerating it. They must then learn to value making others productive more than they value their own individual contributions. And their values-set should be aligned with getting their job satisfaction from managing and leading others.
Passage Two – Managing Managers
This is totally different to managing others. People at this level select and develop the people who will eventually become the organization’s leaders. They get results by getting managers to manage others. In essence, this is pure management. Therefore, it’s critical that promotions to this level be based on demonstrated leadership ability rather than on technical competence. A manager of managers absolutely has to make this layer work by holding their managers of others accountable. They must select the managers, assign managerial and leadership work to them, measure their progress as managers, and coach them. Successful performance in this key level is fundamental for breaking down organizational silos and creating lateral organizations where performance takes precedence over structure. Managers of managers must begin to think beyond their own unit and connect their unit to others. Should they continue to operate with a tight focus on their own arena, they will fail to build communications and operating bridges to others.
Passage Three – Managing a Function
Managers of functions are totally focused on productivity, even while they are involved in strategy. Their task is to require managers of managers to run the operation while they, the functional managers, make the future better. At this layer, they often manage things they haven’t done themselves. They must endeavour to understand “foreign” work – and value it. Functional managers need to become skilled at recognizing functional needs and concerns, usually working in a team with other functional managers to achieve objectives. This takes time away from departmental responsibilities, so delegating to managers of managers becomes even more critical. Futuristic thinking, i.e. recognizing, organizing and implementing long-term strategies, often troubles managers at this level. Essentially, functional managers need to be stretching to find sustainable competitive advantage rather than concentrating on immediate yet temporary success.
Passage Four – Business Managers
Often called multi-functional managers, business managers have the most challenging job of all – and in many ways the most satisfying. On the one hand, they must integrate functions including many they may not fully understand. On the other, they gain significant autonomy and leadership liberation. Thus, this level creates the greatest number of stumbling blocks and the greatest incidence of failure because business managers have responsibility for both cost and revenue. They have to break away from functional thinking to focus on strategy, i.e. move from looking at plans and proposals functionally to embracing profit perspectives as well as long-term views. Their work is a balancing act between future goals and present needs and they often have to make trade-offs between the two. This requires thinking time. Good business managers reserve time for reflection and analysis. This is very difficult if they continue doing things. Learning to accept advice, trust other people and welcome feedback – especially from the functions they have not worked within – is essential for business managers. A common oversight at this level is failure to recognize and use staff functions such as human resources, finance and legal support.
Passage Five – Group Managers
Rather than valuing the success of their own business, group managers value the success of the business managers who report to them. When group managers don’t receive the attention and credit they think they deserve, they may become frustrated and feel that their authority is being threatened, or that they could operate the various businesses better than their business managers. At this level, a critical shift in skill sets and values is essential. Group managers must become proficient at evaluating strategy for capital allocation and deployment. They must develop their business managers as well as their function managers who need to be ready to become business managers. In addition, group managers need to question their mix of businesses in terms of present and future utility to the organization. And finally, they need to assess core capabilities by objectively looking at their resources including human resources and making judgments based on analysis and experience of where resource enhancement is needed. As broad-span executives, group managers need to balance the competing demands of a host of stakeholders including communities, industries, governments and funders/the stock market. Their perspective needs to be broad rather than specialized with generous attention being paid to risks, uncertainties and expanded time lines. In summary, they must adopt a corporate view.
Passage Six – Enterprise Managers
More commonly termed Chief Executives, enterprise managers are focused much more on values than on skills. The organization and its people look to enterprise managers for long-term visionary thinking as well as immediate quarter-by-quarter performance. Good enterprise managers learn to value trade-offs as a means of developing their outward-looking global-thinking perspectives. Their performance may be judged by the success or failure of three or four decisions per year. Preparation for a Chief Executive’s position is often the result of diverse experiences over a long time during which they are given the opportunity to stretch their skills. If they have skipped levels in their development, they and their organizations will be burdened by the equivalent gap in their leadership ability. Consider the formidable challenges they face:
- Delivering consistent, predictable top and bottom line results
- Setting the enterprise’s vision and direction
- Shaping the soft side of the enterprise
- Maintaining an edge in execution and continuous improvement
- Managing the enterprise in a global context.
The majority of an enterprise manager’s time is spent on external relationships. This may lure them away from paying attention to their organization. Consequently a successful operation may quickly go off the rails. Taking advice from a Board of Directors who may be less informed about insider perspectives is a frequent challenge. Good enterprise managers learn to pay attention to Board advice – and to educate the Board to give better advice.
1. Consider using Portraits of Performance as a means of quickly assessing the performance and position of your team members. How might you build this into your regular performance reviews? If you were doing this for yourself, what would your Portrait look like? What needs to happen to complete the lines within your portrait and the portraits of your team members?
2. In your organization is the Leadership Pipeline clear? If there are gaps, what can you do to begin bridging them? Who in the organization might you enlist to get the ball rolling?
Still brilliant after all these years! http://bit.ly/bqX6gG